Every scored evaluation runs multiple model calls: a fast pre-filter to check basic relevance, then a thorough reverification pass, then sub-scoring across experience, skill match and industry alignment. That is not one API call -- it is three or four, against a model that reads your entire CV and the full job description each time.
The tailored CV drafts are more expensive still. They are full-length LLM generations that pull from your actual career text and rewrite it against the specific language of each posting. Not a template with your name swapped in. The model reads the job description, identifies the terminology the ATS will be scanning for, and constructs a draft that uses your real experience in a form that lands above the keyword threshold.
We do not take a placement fee. We do not sell candidate data. We do not have an employer product that subsidises the candidate side. The subscription pays the LLM API costs, the infrastructure, and a margin thin enough to keep the service running. That is the whole business model, stated plainly.
If that argument makes sense to you, the Starter tier is the right place to start -- 100 scored evaluations and 5 CV drafts per month, with a 7-day free trial so you can see what the platform actually produces before anything is charged.
And we are not building this expecting you to stay subscribed for months.
If the platform works the way we think it does, you will land your next role in weeks, not quarters, and you will cancel. That is the outcome we are optimising for. Long subscriptions would mean we have not done our job. The platform is designed to make itself unnecessary as quickly as possible -- score a lot of postings, tailor a lot of CVs, get you in front of the right interviewers, then step out of your way.